To Kenneth Rufo’s roundup of recent debates on populism over at Long Sunday, I’ll add the fragment on Jean-Luc Nancy on ‘the people’, which comes from the recent essay on democracy, more of which is here, updated with an additional para on ‘the people’, apropos the comments.
Needless to say, I share Jon’s criticisms of populism, but perhaps mine were formed less as a posthegemonic inclination (though, this is implicit) than because of populism’s persistent recourse to a biopolitical, racialising frame. To be sure, ‘the people’ might be venerated or derided. But, this very figure is nevertheless worked up into a figure through the functionings of a transcendental gaze - the state, or state-in-waiting - without which people would not be bound together as the people. It’s this representational gesture that populism denies - the naturalisation of politics and the depoliticisation of that which is deemed to be natural.

'
'


