Here’s the full version of “Borders 2.0: Future, Tense”. The attribution should read “… with thanks to Brett Neilson, Bryan Finoki, Melinda Cooper, Aren Aizura and Randy Martin”, and I’d prefer that it did from now on. That being a far less indifferent version of the content (which is to say, the politics), the conversations surrounding the text and which informed its argument, the caveat about responsibility applying.
Just read your article last night
“… Just as new instruments of financial debt and … were exported from their post-colonial laboratories situated beyond Europe and the United States…”
“… tweaked by sub-prime loans and derivatives tested in Latin America …”
the article also mentions the IMF, is the first statement referring to structural adjustment etc and things like micro-credit or something else ?
Do anyone have a pointer to info on a history of sub-prime and derivatives in Latin America ?
Ta
v
dr.woooo [August 18, 2008 @ 3:35 am]
On history, there is the collapse of Bretton Woods, Chicago, Chile, and Milton Friedman. There were floats, and there was (some rather bloody) superfluidity … and lots of betting on (the likely betting on) future capacity (potentiality) … A history which is easier to assume if you were born before the onset of so-called neoliberalisation. But it was Randy Martin who in conversation sharpened some of that argument about testing history - seemed to me like a significant piece of the puzzle.
I don’t understand your question about SAP’s and micro-credit. They’re both forms of debt, yes?
s0metim3s [August 19, 2008 @ 1:38 am]
There’s a new book by Marcus Taylor, From Pinochet to the Third Way: Neoliberalism and Social Transformation in Chile (2008), Zed books I think, which details some of these experiments. Haven’t read it yet but there’s some excerpts on-line
mc [August 19, 2008 @ 4:22 am]