Three remarks on the relation between ‘economic migration’ and the processes of refugee determination. This is the first.
Alongside regimes of migration internment and deportation there are systems of finely tuned controls on so-called ‘economic migration’ - that is, controls on the duration, conditions and direction of labour flows across borders. The one cannot be thought without the other. Indeed, where refugee determination occurs without recourse to Australian (or Australian-funded) internment camps and (threat of) deportation, which is to say, where it occurs in camps administered by the UNHCR or organisations such as the IOM, the Australian Government operates a kind of ‘points system’, screening for those refugee applicants who might ‘fit’ particular criteria deemed important for the development of the Australian labour market.
Which is also to say, and more broadly: what binds the two processes - that of refugee determination and ‘economic migration’ policy - together is the concept of the national economy, competing within an inter-national economy. This national economy is perceived to be the premise rather than result of nationally construed accounting conventions, fiscal arrangements and, of course, the controls on the movements across those borders that sift each movement into legal and illegal, temporary and permanent, and various modulations of these. From the perspective of this ‘national economy’, the regimes of deportation and internment seek to excise those bodies deemed superfluous to ‘national productivity’ and, in so doing and in turn, define - or seek to impose and give shape to - a productive (national) body.