In “Why Work on Rights? Citizenship, Welfare and Property in Empire and Beyond” [Theory & Event, 8:4, 2005], Scott Michaelsen and Scott Cutler Shershow argue that Hardt’s and Negri’s proposition of the three rights - the rights to global citizenship, guaranteed income and reappropriation of the means of production - which are said to give expression to the political power and teleology of the multitude at the conclusion of Empire is, as they put it, fundamentally flawed.